Longhand v.
Laptop Note Taking
A look at recent research by Katherine O’Brien, MA CCPS
In order for students to be academically successful, they
need to be able to learn the material presented in their courses and perform
well on exams. With the nearly
ubiquitous adoption of the use of digital devices for delivery of educational
material and, in many situations, notetaking as well as the completion of
assignments, the question of which is a more effective methodology for learning
is of great import.
Dr. Pam Mueller & Dr. Daniel Oppenheimer published a
paper in 2014 sharing the results of their research into this topic. Their study was the first to focus on a direct
comparison of the two styles of notetaking.
Other research has focused on the impact of the many distractions
available on laptops and how well students could multitask. Many researchers have shown that students
tend to not be on task and to be less satisfied with their education than their
pen wielding peers.
Let’s take a look at the head to head comparison of college
student’s comprehension retention abilities when offline laptops and pen and
paper were the only options for
notetaking during presentations.
In the past, some research showed that the processing of the
information that takes place during manual notetaking improves learning and
retention. When a student takes notes
during a lecture, s/he cannot keep up with the presenter so must sort and
organize the material, as well as abbreviate it in order to record it. Note taking can include summarizing,
paraphrasing, and mapping concepts. It
can also take the form of creating a verbatim transcript of what is heard. Other studies have shown that verbatim note
taking predicts poorer performance than non-verbatim note taking, especially on
integrative and conceptual items.
Integrating the new information with prior knowledge and with
understanding new concepts are both improved when the note taker processes and
records the information without taking a verbatim approach.
In this current study, it was repeatedly noted that students
using laptops strongly tended to take more notes, and to take notes in the
verbatim copyist style, rather than processing the information and creating
their own re-presentation of it like the students taking notes longhand. It was found that the students who took notes
longhand and were afforded an opportunity to study them performed better on
examination than any of the other participants.
The longhand note takers also did better than the laptop users when
neither was permitted to review their notes.
Some of them even outperformed the laptop users who had been able to
study their notes.
Although they recorded fewer words, those who used pen and
paper outperformed their technology using peers for both conceptual and factual
questions. Selecting more important
information to record may have enabled them to study the material more
efficiently. They concluded: “Although
more notes are beneficial, at least to a point, if the notes are taken indiscriminately
or by mindlessly transcribing content, as is more likely the case on a laptop
than when notes are taken longhand, the benefit disappears. Indeed, synthesizing and summarizing content
rather than verbatim transcription can serve as a desirable difficulty toward
improved educational outcomes…. For that reason, laptop use in classrooms
should be viewed with a healthy dose of caution; despite their growing
popularity, laptops may be doing more harm in classrooms than good.”